ORACLE APPLICATIONS ARCHIVES

Topicwise collection of
Postings on Mail Lists
ON
MISCELLANEOUS TOPICS



Oracle database vs. SQL Server

Siddharth Shah wrote:

Hi,

I have heard that there is something within Pentium 3 that whenever you go online, it connects with Microsoft and lets them know whether you are using a registered or unregistered software. Does anyone have any idea about this?

Also, can someone point me out the advantages and disadvantages of Oracle and SQL Server. Is there a web site which points out the differences?

Thank you in advance.
Siddharth Shah


Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 12:49:56 -0700
From: "sean smith" kiowasean@zdnetmail.com
Subject: RE: Technical Question!

With regard to the Oracle database vs. SQL Server question, there have been two items I've seen recently. One was in PC Magazine (ziff-davis publishes this and alway's seems a little to Microsoft friendly to me.) The PC magazine article found that in small to mid-sized enterprizes, with correspondingly low budgets, SQL Server was the product of choice. The same article indicated that most database product licenses prohibit the publication of "benchmarks."

There is also a web site hosted by the Relational Database Council, that has permission and does some benchmarking. On their site, Oracle is the consisent winner.

The final word on which database is best is probably, "it depends" on factors ranging from hardware, to support and what products are running on the database. I would have to say that for proven performance in large enterprises, that Oracle is the current champion.

On the PIII question, what Intel did was to put a "serial number" on each chip. Web site's have the ability to "prove" that someone signed on to their site was using a computer with that unique serial number. Pretty good proof of who purchased something from you for purposes of e-commerce. Intel announced that they were taking the feature off, due to privacy concerns.


Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:57:23 -0500
From: "Hostetler, Don" Don.Hostetler@impacgroup.com
Subject: RE: Technical Question! - Oracle vs. SQL Server

Sean you are right on the money. We performed a stress test with about 300 concurrent users on a SQL Server/NT platform and the server could not handle the load. The system failed the stress test based upon our application design relative to SQL server's architecture regarding sequence generation. We then installed Oracle utilizing the same hardware and operating system and the server handled the load with about 50% of the system's resources. Again I would like to state, this test was specific to our application design.

Regards, Don Hostetler



Government Cos. using 10.7 Mfg

Pico Ritch-P28386 Ritch.Pico@motorola.com 07/14/99 09:51AM

Are there any companies out there that are currently using Oracle 10.7 or higher (manufacturing modules)in the Government environment?. We use Project & Task for labor, inventory, receipts, basically for all tracking issues. We would like to know if there are any other companies in this situation, and how they are working this.

Thanks,
Ritch Pico!
Oracle Phase II Implementation
Motorola CE, CGISS, SSG
Space Systems and Services Division (SSSD)
8220 E. Roosevelt, M/D R3238
Scottsdale, AZ 85257
Ph(602)441-4069,
Pager 599-9504,
FAX 441-6181


Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 15:05:58 -0600
From: "Deborah Linke" LINKE@wapa.gov
To: oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca, Ritch.Pico@motorola.com
Subject: Re: Government Issues

Hi Pico. Western Area Power Administration is a federal agency presently using version 10.7SC in an HP-UX, Citrix environment. We have General Ledger, Project Accounting, Purchasing, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, Fixed Assets, Discoverer, and Tutor in production.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Best regards,
Deborah Linke
303-275-1618



Named Users vs. Concurrent Users

Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 22:42:04 MYT-8
From: philip@aleytys.pc.my
Subject: GEN: Named Users vs. Concurrent Users

Dear All,

Our support contract is up for renewal and the Oracle Customer Supportdroid called me up and told me that we have to convert from concurrent users to named users. I think she also said that 1 concurrent user equals two concurrent users. Also now there seems to be a distinction between casual users and normal users. I didn't get much sense from that conversation.

Can anyone here explain what Oracle's current policy is? Everytime we renew our contract the way they work out the number of users changes and the net effect is a price hike. I have a bad feeling that I'm going to have to explain to the Finance VP why there is a big hole in my budget this financial year.

Philip


Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:52:32 -0400
From: "Kurylo, Mary" Kuryma@consumer.org
Subject: RE: Named Users vs. Concurrent Users

Our contract expired at the end of May. I didn't have to change from concurrent to named. My understanding of how the pricing works is that there is a flat fee per Module (except Alert which is based on # of concurrent users.)

If you do any development then there are additional fees for AOL, C, SQL*Plus, Developer. These are also based on # of concurrent users.

Then there is a Server fee based on # of concurrent users and a Tech Fee also based on # of concurrent users.

I also know that there were drastic changes made to Oracle support pricing for their web server. I believe that it went from # of concurrent users to # of processors (at a different rate of course.)

Oracle fiscal year ended in May, and they may have made more changes. It's frustrating that they change it so often. I don't think I have two proposals that are even worded the same, so that I can made a comparison from year to year.

Bottom line... if you're confused, call you sales rep and don't let him/her off the phone until you fully understand what the quote is for and why it's so differnt from last year.

Mary Kurylo
Applications Development Analyst
Consumers Union of US Inc.
kuryma@consumer.org


Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:43:54 -0400
From: John Raams jraams@mvest.com
Subject: RE: Named Users vs. Concurrent Users

Mary is in the main correct. Oracle does NOT sell by the module anymore it now sells by named users. If you are existing customer, you may be able to get the Oracle sales person to sell you concurrent user licenses for your existing applications. Your sales person may say NO depending on how your original contract is written.

The main modules are now sold in Bundles e.g. : Oracle financials bundle GL,AP,AR,CM,FA is one bundle and is sold by named users / not concurrent.. The good thing about it is that if you are a named user in any of the financial modules you are also a user of the rest of the financials modules.

Some modules that I am aware of that are still sold separately are, Oracle service or Oracle sales compensation. most of the rest are sold in bundles with named and casual users. Some other applications etc are still sold as concurrent licenses. Its a real mishmash

I also believe that the minimum number of named users you can buy is 25 for Fins and 50 for manufacturing. This I believe can be broken up into named and casual users. Again please speak to your Oracle sales staff to get a definitive statement and get it in writing.

Keep smiling.
John Raams
Executive Vice President & General Manager,
Enterprise Applications Solutions
mVest Technology Solutions
14 Campus Boulevard, Suite 250
Newtown Square, PA 19073-3287
Office Telephone: 610 359 0270 Ext: 304
Cell phone: 610 513 2308
Fax: 610 359 0271
www.mvest.com



Data flow diagrams between OE-INV-PO

Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:11:20 -0400
From: John Sweeney jsweeney@goaa.org
Subject: OE-INV-PO - data flow diagrams needed

We are running Oracle Financials 10.7 SC161 on RDBMS 8.0.5 and Sun Solaris plaform. We are running PO,OE,INV,PA,AP,AR,GL, and CE. PO,AP,AR, and GL are the Govt versions of these modules. We are also running Oracle HR. I am looking for a documented data flow diagram or list of:
1. Top Level Flow chart of all Oracle modules showing the links/data flows between them
2. Lower level List of actual tables(all tables, including interface and temp) and their contents that get passed in the interfaces (ie something similar to the open interface table description in the technical reference manual - I don't seem to be able to find the same for the internal interfaces) .

Specifically, I am interested in the relationship between Purchasing, Order Entry, and Inventory. I'd appreciate if anyone was willing to share anything. If there is nothing already out there....I will try to create the diagrams myself (and share if requested).

John Sweeney
GOAA, IT Department
407-825-3280


Phantom Item/Phantom Assembly

Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:24:10 +0200
From: Sujata.Chary@gemplus.com
Subject: Phantom Item/Phantom Assembly

Hello all,

can any body explain to me what exactly is a phantom item and phantom assembly is and when & how to use them?

Thanks SC


Talking to Oracle Application

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:39:42 -0400
From: Niraj.Juneaj@sagasoftware.com
Subject: Oracle Applications .. and HOW DO I TALK TO THEM

Hi ,

I am looking for a way to access Oracle Applications .

Is there a way I can talk to Oracle Applications using something like
1. API 's
2. XML DTD'd
3 . OR Some native approach

I know SAP has BAPIS and JD Edwards has its own way . Whats the way for Oracle Appications.

Your help greatly Appreciated .....
Cheers Niraj


Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 11:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Gillins kgillins@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Oracle Applications .. and HOW DO I TALK TO THEM

Oracle SQLPLUS



List of APIs for Oracle Financials

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 07:02:09 PDT
From: "n j" the_2000_man@excite.com
Subject: Oracle Financial API 's

URGENT HELP NEEDED...

I am aware that there are API to access the ORACLE HRMS system . Are their API's to access Oracle Financial Modules.

I would appreciate if someone could point me to where I could get this information .

Cheers Niraj


Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:07:10 -0500
From: "Matson, Mark J." MatsonMJ@bvsg.com
To: "'oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca'" oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca
Subject: RE: Oracle Financial API 's

Niraj,

Yes there are other APIs for other systems. Please be more specific as to what you are looking for and what version of the apps you are on...

Mahalo (Thanks).
Mark J. Matson
BV Solutions Group
A Black & Veatch Company


Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 07:29:34 PDT
From: "n j" the_2000_man@excite.com
To: oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca
Subject: RE: Oracle Financial API 's

Hi Mark,

I really appreciate your response back. OK here is our problem.

We are an EAI software company and are trying to write adapters that talk to different ERP's . (We have written adapters for SAP / CICS etc...) Now we have to write an adapter for Oracle applications.

I am in a stage of gathering information for ways to talk to ORacle Applications ( I know this is a vast area and I need to be more specific). I figured out that Oracle HRMS has some API's (I guess in the form of Procedures and Functions).

My Questions :
1. Where can I find the complete list of all the API's in Oracle HRMS
2. Is there a central place to find all the documentaion for the APIs.

Your Help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers Niraj


Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:50:49 -0400
From: "Bartoletti, Mike" BartolMi@rf.suny.edu
To: "'oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca'" oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca
Subject: RE: Oracle Financial API 's

FIN Uses open interface tables

Michael Bartoletti
Applications Development
Research Foundation of SUNY
ph:(518)434-7204
fx:(518)434-7211
mailto:bartolmi@rfsuny.org


Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:56:31 -0500
From: "Matson, Mark J." MatsonMJ@bvsg.com
To: "'oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca'" oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca
Subject: RE: Oracle Financial API 's

Niraj,

Log in to Oracle Applications using any responsibility. Then go in to the Help menu on the menu bar, choose Oracle Applications Library. Once in the Oracle Applications Library choose Human Resources. In Human Resources choose New Features (is at the bottom), within New Features choose New APIs, this will give you a listing of all publicly callable business process APIs for Human Resources.

I have yet to find a central place that contains info for all APIs. It seems that every module does it differently. For example, Oracle Projects (PA) has a set of APIs to maintain project/task data. They call this set Activity Management Gateway (AMG). It is really just another set of APIs.

I hope this helps.
Mahalo (Thanks).
Mark J. Matson
BV Solutions Group
A Black & Veatch Company



Patch Methodology - Paper on

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:08:23 -0400
From: mwilburn@csc.com
To: oraapps-l@cpa.qc.ca
Subject: Re: Patch Strategy Documentation

For those of you looking for some information on what others have done in this area, here is a web site with a methodology document.

http://members.home.net/arivenes/aolpatch.htm


Web enabled Oracle Application modules / versions

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 03:30:13 +0100
From: "SRS FreeZone" srs@freezone.co.uk
Subject: NCA, v11, WebApps...confused? I am!

Hi,

I have just finished implementing 10.7SC of PO/AP/OE/INV and have also supported 10.7SC of HR/Payroll.

Then along comes 10.7NCA
Then v11 (which is also NCA)
There's WebApps
There's Self Service WebApps
Then there's v11i

I'm not sure which uses the internet and which doesn't. Can anyone enlighten/correct me on the following?

[With our 10.7SC we had the client forms on the NT server, nothing to speak of on the NT client, and the database on the unix box.]

NCA means you dont need to have a hard disk on your client. You use a web browser like Explorer to access the application. But,
1) - are Oracle Forms 4.5 used? ie FMXs?
2) - If so, where are they stored? On the NT server like SC?
3) - So you just type in www.... in your browser and from then onwards you get the standard FMX forms, just as though you were running SC?
4) - Are you really using the "Internet"? ie can you access the application from anywhere in the world with just a web browser?
5) - Do you need to have "Oracle Application Server" or "Oracle Web Application Server"?

6) Is v11 NCA-only? So its like an upgraded 10.7NCA then - ie enhanced functionality (and reduced bugs!)?

These WebApps things. I know my client had got the Requisitions one working on the database the 10.7SC app was running on but because they wanted a lot of bespoking, they just built their own web form (html, Java or whatever) instead, and used one of the above 2 "servers".
7) - Is WebApps the same as Self Service WebApps (SSWA)?
8) - Oracle's v11 Upgrade page says SSWA is new in v11.
9) - But why do these SSWA things exist if NCA is web-enabled anyway? I am confused here! Is it so you can use SSWA with a non-internet version (ie 10.7SC or below)?

10) What's v11i? The new version of v11?

Please explain! You may use technical terms.
Thanks,
Steve Spencer.


Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 06:39:54 -0700
From: McRaney Ronald-MCG32315 rmcraney@itexchsrv2.phx.mcd.mot.com
Subject: RE: NCA, v11, WebApps...confused? I am!

To conserve space, the questions posed by Steve are not repeated as was intended by Ron - my apologies for the same. However the answers are in the same order in which the questions were posed by Steve ------rchath

1) - Yes, for SC you will find 16-bit forms and for 10.7 NCA and 11 you will find 4.5 32-bit forms. The change will come with 11i where it jumps to Version 6.

2) - If you are using NT for the middle-tier the forms can be there along with the Web Server that serves the forms to user. The database can be located on separate server. All three can be located on same server. WinNT, Sun, AIX, HP and so on, depends on your infrastructure and users and performance.

3) - Yes.

4) - Intranet more likely, depends on your firewall or security setup. Just depends how you want to advertise the start page for Applications, more than likely "intranet".

5) - They are the same, another name change. Oracle Application Server supported presently with Apps is 3.0.1.1. You will need to license the Developer 2000 Application Server which is separate from the Dev 2000.

6) - Yes. No, character.

7) - Self Service Web Apps is a separate group modules, check the MetaLink for specifics

8) - Yes, There were some backports on some.

9) - They Employee Travel and Expense part of SSWA can be used with 10.7SC, need Workflow however.

10) - Version that will work with 8i, also forms move to Version 6 of Developer.


Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 12:50:44 -0400
From: "Bartoletti, Mike" BartolMi@rf.suny.edu
Subject: RE: NCA, v11, WebApps...confused? I am!

My answers are placed in your original email and are based solely on the knowledge I have massed while being in the middle of a Release 11.0.2 installation.

To conserve space, the questions posed by Steve are not repeated as was intended by Michael - my apologies for the same. However the answers are in the same order in which the questions were posed by Steve ------rchath

1) - The FMXs are stored on the server.

2) - On the NT server like SC?

3) - They are not "standard". In release 11 they are java applets rendered from the fmx by the forms server, so each form is a floating window with a floating menu bar.

4) - There seem to be some weird issues with firewalls, but yes, you can run them from anywhere.

5) - Yes, that is the forms server I described above. You really need a web server then a forms server then the database server.

6) - So its like an upgraded 10.7NCA then - ie enhanced functionality (and reduced bugs!)? Yes, 11 is NCA only.

7) - I think so.

8) - Do not understand that.

9) - I think it is just functionality that is left as HTML pages and not converted to java.

10) - 11i is really 11.5 and it uses the 8i database. It is written with forms 6 where 11.0.2 is written in forms 4.5. The interface is more like SC where there is a MDI frame and all.

Michael Bartoletti
Applications Development
Research Foundation of SUNY
ph:(518)434-7204
fx:(518)434-7211
mailto:bartolmi@rfsuny.org


Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 18:07:26 -0500
From: "Uptmore, Chris" uptmorec@kci1.com
Subject: RE: NCA, v11, WebApps...confused? I am!

Ron does a nice job below from what I understand about this. I just wanted to add some things concerning Self-Sevice Web Apps (SSWA) vs. Web Apps that lead to 2 questions:

SSWA refers to HTML-only/dynamic HTML "forms"/"single-transaction" GUI screens, as opposed to Forms45-based GUI forms/screens. This dynamic HTML is produced by database-resident PL/SQL "procedures" with embedded JAVA-script/HTML (did I say that right? point is, no Forms45).

I like to think of "Web Apps" as referring to "Web Forms" - the JAVA-based 32-bit Forms45 NCA/GUI Forms (as opposed to the non-JAVA 16-bit Forms45 forms used by the "non-browser/internet" SmartClient implementation of GUI.

For SC, there was no browser, no Webserver, no internet.
For NCA, there is a browser, Webserver, Forms Server and internet/intranet.
SSWA needs a Webserver but not a Forms Server.

So to me, if you are 10.7 NCA or 11, you've got the Webserver/internet components, which means you've got the SSWA infrastructure.

For 10.7 SC, you still need the internet components for SSWA, but not the Forms Server until you want 10.7 NCA or 11.

As far as 3 tiers, I think of it as always needing an RDBMS Server tier (back end), and a Web Browser (front-end "server" client - Netscape, IE or Oracle's proprietary "AppletViewer").

The middle tier is for the Webserver, and (for 10.7 NCA or 11) the Forms Server, and they can both reside on the same "back end" RDBMS Server.

For just SSWA with 10.7 Char or SC, I believe a 2-tier architecture will suffice, (i.e., Browser, and RDBMS Server that also has the Webserver).

For NCA with or without SSWA, I would think the 3-tier architecture makes more sense, where the middle tier is a separate UNIX Server to handle the 4.5 Forms and Webserver.

Given that UNIX is the RDBMS Server, and since performance is always a concern, I would stick with UNIX in the middle.

Although I have never seen an apples-to-apples performance/up-time comparison substituting NT for UNIX in the middle tier, I have a feeling UNIX would win by a large margin, based upon what I have heard.

I am curious about 2 things. Has anyone had the luxury of time and resources to actually:
1. do a "3-tier comparison" using UNIX vs. NT as the middle tier, all other things equal?
2. shift from a 2-tier to a 3-tier with all other things equal adding UNIX vs. NT in the middle?

Thanks, Chris